As a housing attorney, I’ve seen the disconnect up close: politicians say they want more housing, yet adopt policies that delay, water down, or outright block the very homes they claim to support. These barriers — often well-intentioned on paper — have a devastating real-world impact: they drive up the cost of living and push people out of the communities they call home.
Los Angeles is now one of the most unaffordable cities in the country. That’s not by accident — it’s the direct result of decades of underbuilding. And the people paying the highest price are working families, low-income renters, and communities of color who face rising rents, shrinking options, and mass displacement. Even dual-income professionals increasingly find themselves priced out. The math is simple: we don’t have enough housing. We must build more. Full stop.
That’s why I’m running to lead on housing policy at the state level. In the 26th District and across California, we need more multifamily housing in urban areas — especially near transit and jobs. I’ll fight for policies that increase density in high-opportunity neighborhoods, build more workforce housing, streamline approvals and inspections, mandate staffing increases for permitting departments, increase home ownership in urban areas, make the construction of duplexes and fourplexes more viable and ensure cities follow state housing law. More homes in walkable, transit-connected areas not only reduce costs, they cut emissions and vehicle miles traveled — allowing people to live closer to where they work and raise their families.
Too often, public debate frames housing production and tenant protections as opposing forces. I reject that false choice. California must do both: build more housing and protect the people already here. I support thoughtful just-cause eviction protections, anti-rent-gouging laws, and expanding affordability covenants to 99 years. I’m in favor of rolling rent control legislation like the 2019 Tenant Protection Act, and I believe new development must come with safeguards for vulnerable low and fixed-income tenants: right-of-return guarantees or displacement compensation.
Finally, we need to rethink how we use public dollars to increase affordable housing. Rather than always defaulting to costly new construction, we should prioritize acquiring existing housing and converting it into permanently affordable homes for low-, middle-, and working-class families and exploring innovative social housing models, community land trusts and using public land to build affordable housing.
The housing crisis wasn’t inevitable — it was a policy choice. It’s time to choose differently. And I’m ready to lead that fight.